Search for: "Vieth v. Jubelirer"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
As Justice Scalia noted in his plurality opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court has thus far avoided revisiting the merits of claims based on partisan gerrymandering since Vieth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:40 am
[6] Vieth v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
Whitford 16-1161 Issues: (1) Whether the district court violated Vieth v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm
Since Kennedy’s solo opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
By the time of Vieth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
And in Vieth v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
That kind of judicial minimalism is all that would be needed in this case.__________________________* In 2004, in a dissenting opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
” In Vieth v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia both noted this clustering effect in Vieth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
Bandemer, 1986; and Vieth v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
Carr (1962) 369 U.S.186 (Findlaw subscr. req'd) and Vieth v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Reno), and avoided the morass of partisan gerrymandering (Vieth v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
In light of all the language in Vieth v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:18 am
(quoting Vieth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
Jubelirer. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
The plurality that would have reversed Bandemer in the 2004 case of Vieth v. [read post]
