Search for: "Vowell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2022, 6:33 am
As stated above, in a perfect rhyme the last stressed vowel and all following sounds are identical in both words.If the sound preceding the stressed vowel is also identical, the rhyme is sometimes considered to be inferior and not a perfect rhyme after all. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 2:53 pm
" United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
That mark would be pronounced as two syllables and not three, contrary to what the Board of Appeal stated as an alternative in its decision. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:13 am
486/07, Ford Motor Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Unnecessarily Long and Pompous Name), Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
’” Applicant acknowledged that “the parties’ marks are visually similar because they both contain the vowels and letters IELA/IELLA in the same order and combination. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by SHG
  Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
So when a Wisconsin state court lets loose with an excellent preemption decision, we figure it's worth taking a look.Blunt involved a claimed defect in a cardiac defibrillator - one of those implanted gadgets that stands by to stabilize heart rhythm (love that word, unique in the English language with more syllables than vowels) in people with chronic heart problems. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:51 am
By Mike Dorf Last year, in Ricci v. [read post]