Search for: "WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2016, 8:08 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
Wal-Mart Stores East LP Proving whether an “unreasonably dangerous” condition exists often requires a careful examination of the facts surrounding a particular accident. [read post]
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, the judge questioned the long established “transitory water doctrine,” which has often shielded property owners from liability. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:51 am by Whittel & Melton, LLC
Wal-Mart Stores East LP, asks the court to order Walmart to reinstate the woman with back pay as well as compensatory and punitive damages. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:30 am by Nassiri Law
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, within just a month of the new manager taking charge, the worker was suspended and forced to resubmit the medical paperwork that allowed him access to reasonable accommodations. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:20 am by Ron Miller
In Osterhout v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, the giant retailer was denied its motion to dismiss an employee’s age, gender and disability discrimination and FMLA interference and retaliation claims based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel despite her failure to disclose those claims in bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Steven Cohen
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al – United Sates District Court – Southern District of Alabama – November 12th, 2015 – This case involves a slip & fall out side of a Walmart. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:53 am by Mark Hartsoe
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, August 6, 2014, Knoxville Injury Lawyer Blog Knoxville Court Sides With Insurer in Wrongful Death Case: Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:57 am by Mark Hartsoe
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, August 6, 2014, Knoxville Injury Lawyer Blog Knoxville Court Sides With Insurer in Wrongful Death Case: Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:09 pm by Law Lady
WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP, Appellee. 2nd District.Torts -- Automobile accident -- Rear-end collision -- Evidence -- Damages -- Claim that trial court, in granting plaintiff's motion in limine, improperly precluded defendants from presenting testimony that the amount of damages plaintiff was claiming was not reasonable or necessary for the injuries at issue was not preserved for appeal where no transcript of hearing on motion in limine was in the record… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Southern District of Alabama found  (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]