Search for: "WALKER v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 81 - 100
of 747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
In Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Why would the California Supreme Court be inclined to stay out of this matter? [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Walker’s August 2010 decision striking down “Proposition 8″ will now go into effect formally. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm
Schwarzenegger, No. 09-2292 (available here) Chief Judge Vaughn Walker of the Northern District of California handed down the long awaited decision in Perry v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:10 pm
Doherty (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 1 [ratio reduced from 4-to-1 down to 1-to-1]; Walker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:44 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker on Thursday [July 2nd] will consider arguments on whether to block Proposition 8, which amended the California constitution last November and barred gay and lesbian couples from being legally married in the state ...With tough legal hurdles to persuade federal judges to block state laws at such an early stage, legal experts say the odds are against Walker granting the injunction request. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm
In a landmark decision in Perry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
However, through appeal, the order was stayed until the United States Supreme Court reinstated Judge Walker's ruling on technical grounds in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 11:00 pm
Walker, 2009 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
., LLC v Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP ; 2010 NY Slip Op 02489 ; Decided on March 25, 2010 ; Appellate Division, First Department reminds us that although the NY statute of limitations is 3 years, the California statute of limitations for legal malpractice is only 1 year. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
In Radcliffe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
(People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
I'm pleased with the District Court's decision in Perry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:06 am
Schwarzenegger, the federal challenge to California's ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:54 pm
(Dale Carpenter) The Ninth Circuit has stayed Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision requiring California to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples starting Wednesday. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:17 am
Yesterday afternoon, federal district court judge Vaughn Walker declined to stay his decision invalidating California’s ban on same-sex marriage, re-igniting speculation that the issue will soon come before the Supreme Court. [read post]
