Search for: "WALKER v. CALIFORNIA" Results 121 - 140 of 747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am by Jenny Egan
 In today’s Washington Post, Edwin Meese has an op-ed piece in which he argues that Judge Walker’s decision ignored binding Supreme Court precedent – namely, Baker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am by Lyle Denniston
  For that, they relied on the Justices’ one-line ruling on Oct. 10, 1971, in Baker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 3:20 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
In a stunning decision this afternoon, finding California's Proposition 8 ballot initiative banning gay marriage unconstitutional, Walker trod heavily on the path Kennedy has blazed on gay rights: "[I]t would demean a married couple were it to be said marriage is simply about the right to have sexual intercourse," quotes Walker. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm by Lorna Jaynes
Schwarzenegger Following the holding of the California Supreme Court in May 2008 in the Perry v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:05 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Less than a week later, a Media Coalition of national news networks sent a letter to Judge Walker, informing him of the Coalition's interest in "gavel-to-gavel" television coverage of the trial in Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:03 pm
This is about a case the California Court of Appeals recently decided: People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:32 am by SHG
Chief Judge Vaughn Walker's decision in Perry v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm by Cindy Dabney
  It is no less contentious since it was overturned in early August, by the case Perry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:11 am by Kent Scheidegger
The United States Supreme Court has unanimously reversed the Ninth Circuit in the California murder case of Walker v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Judge Walker has ordered that the stay of entry of judgment in Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Evans and the California state court litigation over same-sex marriage, but I had another case in mind: Bush v. [read post]