Search for: "WARD v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,785
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2024, 8:00 am
Ward v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:07 am
Ronen Bergman, Euan Ward, Ephrat Livni, Aaron Boxerman, and Anushka Patil report for the New York Times; CNN reports. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 7:46 am
From yesterday's decision in Hines v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:06 am
From Holt v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 2:32 am
My friend and former Dean Ward Farnsworth, writing after (and about) Bush v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:21 am
In 1892’s landmark case, “Illinois Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:21 am
In 1892’s landmark case, “Illinois Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am
Georgia State Election Board Rule Challenge (Abhiraman, et al., v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 628-29 (1935)(limiting the holding in Myers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Even more important for Wirt was the current American state of mind, a so [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
” While Ward Ferdinandusse and Alex Whiting have argued in favor of the ICC focusing on “little fish cases,” the OTP’s new complementarity policy points in the opposite direction. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 2:04 pm
The recent decision by Judge Amit Mehta in United States et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of… [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:28 am
Ward v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 8:56 am
Paye v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:57 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:42 pm
Assoc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
However, the Police Commissioner found that there was no reasonable dispute concerning the test results and in matters of police discipline, great leeway is accorded the Police Commissioner's determination concerning appropriate punishment because, the Commissioner, not the courts, are accountable to the public for the integrity of the police force (Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827, 828 [1991]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
However, the Police Commissioner found that there was no reasonable dispute concerning the test results and in matters of police discipline, great leeway is accorded the Police Commissioner's determination concerning appropriate punishment because, the Commissioner, not the courts, are accountable to the public for the integrity of the police force (Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827, 828 [1991]). [read post]
