Search for: "WARD v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 1,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2020, 8:19 pm by Patent Docs
Thomas Cotter, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota School of Law; Charlotte Jacobsen of Ropes & Gray; and Jenifer Ward, executive counsel-corporate IP technologies, operations and transactions, General Electric Co. will analyze: • The current state of relevant case law, including Halo v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Richard Altieri, Hayley Evans
The court also cited its 1798 decision to postpone cases, which included United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
  The first focused on the use of leverage against states through pressure from private actors. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by mtlawlibrary
Ward DA 17-0494 2020 MT 36 Criminal – Assault-Partner/Family State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New on the podcast: Black Lives Matter, a qualified immunity cert petition (Kelsay v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
If your personal injury lawyer instructs you not to file a claim with your health insurer concerning your medical care, you may instead be in the hands of a “lien doctor” [Sara Randazzo, WSJ, paywall] Supreme Court passes up opportunity to decide whether the Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to business defendants, and also whether a state can conjure an excessive fine out of existence by conceptually slicing it up into smaller daily fines [Ilya Shapiro on… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]