Search for: "WASHINGTON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (DC Cir., Aug. 17, 2018), the D.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:13 pm
Three of the defendants, not including the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, had moved for sanctions in the form of a dismissal or a postponement. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:42 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:42 am
He has successfully litigated multiple cases against truck and bus companies, the Washington Metropolitan Area transit Authority, and other automobile owners. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Area Transit Auth., 2020 U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority).Mr. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:38 pm
Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The facts of the case are rather simple. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am
By Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad Introduction National Museum in Sweden, National Gallery of Art in Washington DC, Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, National Gallery in London, Louvre… climate protestors have been increasingly frequenting art museums. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:57 am
He has successfully litigated multiple cases against truck and bus companies, the Washington Metropolitan Area transit Authority, and other automobile owners. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Mineta, 319 F.Supp.2d 69 (D.D.C. 2004), that the D.C. area Metropolitan Area Transit Authority unconstitutionally prohibited pro-marijuana advertisements in subway stations, where WMATA's decision was based on federal legislation prohibiting such advertisements in transit systems. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:13 am
Yet a D.C. district court has upheld a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority exclusion that was nearly identical to the one struck down in Rosenberger. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:20 pm
Here's what happened in Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:20 pm
Here's what happened in Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am
There, Archdiocese officials have sued the Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (or Metro) over the Metro’s decision to not display Archdiocese advertising on public transportation. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
In its opinion earlier this year in Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, March 10, 2015, Motz, D.). [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:27 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (1997 WL 411946 , not reported in Fed. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455, involving bus-advertisement policies that prohibit religious themes, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, issued an opinion respecting denial. [read post]
