Search for: "WATKINS v. U.S." Results 1 - 20 of 321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
However, where disqualification is not required under objective standards, a judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Now that Donald Trump has secured the Republican nomination, won federal court rulings making it extremely unlikely he will be disqualified from seeking office, and apparently established that even a felony conviction will not torpedo his campaign, the time has truly come for a careful analysis of his campaign’s immigration policy proposals. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
She served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District from 2002 to 2003. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm by Reference Staff
Most importantly it places her case in a history of LGBTQ rights litigation, including Watkins v. [read post]