Search for: "WELLS v. REYNOLDS" Results 521 - 540 of 653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
   This is curious because this principle already forms part of English law, having been established 20 years ago in the case of Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
People are just too, well, human, and creative in their writing. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
Epic lawsuit as well as other actions in Japan and South Korea. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Such a rule might well reduce the likelihood that unmeritorious and trivial cases will be brought in future. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:17 am by Race to the Bottom
In particular, this Rule includes the requirements for a shareholder to submit a proposal, as well as the ways in which a company may exclude a shareholder proposal from its proxy materials. [read post]