Search for: "WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP." Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 11:55 am by Jessica Grigsby
Major Fan Recalls During the Past Five Years In March of 2012, Westinghouse Lighting Corp., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, recalled about 7,000 Ceiling Fans due to light bulb issues that can make the fans overheat, creating fire and shock risks for those using them. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:55 am by John Demas
Major Fan Recalls During the Past Five Years In March of 2012, Westinghouse Lighting Corp., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, recalled about 7,000 Ceiling Fans due to light bulb issues that can make the fans overheat, creating fire and shock risks for those using them. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 12:37 pm
Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with Westinghouse Lighting Corp., of Philadelphia, Pa.has announced a voluntary recall of its Ceiling Fans.. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am by Schachtman
Westinghouse Electric Corp., 522 S.E.2d 424 (W.Va. 1999). [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:24 pm by Eric Schweibenz
No. 5:06-CV-246-DF) asserting that V, Inc., Westinghouse Digital Electronics, LLC, Funai Corp., Inc., Funai Electric Co., Ltd., Polaroid Corp., Petters Group Worldwide, LLC, APH USA, Inc., and Akai Electric Co., Ltd. infringe the asserted patents, which resulted in some defendants taking a license and a judgment of infringement as to one defendant. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm by lawmrh
Supreme Court weighed in on the issue in Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:07 am by Bryan Fears
Brashers has named eight defendants in her Texas wrongful death lawsuit, including Ametek, Able Supply, Champlain Cable Corp., Hercules Inc., Guardine, Westinghouse Electric Co. and Jett Weld Inc. as well as Union Oil Company of California. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
General Electric Co., 3 F.3d 329, 334 (9th Cir. 1993). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Asbestos Corp., 480 A.2d 647, 651 (Del. 1984), an asbestos case (obviously), but that was as much because of lack of exposure as due to any evaluation of the viability of the underlying claim.Moreover, Guinan I stated that not only was medical monitoring itself uncertain under Delaware law, but plaintiffs advocated a "novel theory that a tort claim for medical monitoring can be applied to medical procedures and devices. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:26 pm
Inst. of Technology, 129 F.3d 681(1st Cir. 1997); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. [read post]