Search for: "WIFE v. Husband"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 10:30 pm
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if you are going to claim that you are a refugee due to your sexual orientation, come up with clear convincing evidence.This was not the case in SZMNV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, where the wife claimed refugee status because she was a lesbian and would therefore be persecuted in India, and the husband claimed refugee status because:of [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:43 am
In the case, Wood v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 3:34 am
Blaine v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:27 am
Regina v L (Evidence of wife) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “There was no requirement to tell a wife that she was not a compellable witness against her husband before interviewing her about a crime of which her husband was suspected. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
Thorpe, Reinbold, Trustee, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 2:48 am
In Mahoney-Buntzman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Phoenix v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:46 am
Interestingly in this Wood v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:45 am
V. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 11:47 am
CENTA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:41 am
Yes, the court ruled in Shaver v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
The wife filed a demurrer to the husband’s cross-bill. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
In the August 23, 2023 opinion in Moore v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 1:39 pm
The August 18, 2021, Court of Appeals opinion in Weller v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:25 pm
Fitzgerald v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:20 pm
In Matter of Eirand-Herskowitz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:00 am
In the recent case of Parente v Parente, the wife brought a motion to Ontario requesting advance costs (interim disbursements) and an advance on equalization. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
The husband did not attend the hearing of the wife's application, but was represented by leading counsel and junior counsel.The court was therefore in the position of having to deal with the wife's application with no evidence from the husband as to his financial position.The wife's counsel submitted to the court that under the principles in Hadkinson v. [read post]
