Search for: "WILLIAMS v. OKLAHOMA CITY" Results 61 - 80 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
McDaniel, Case Western Reserve University, “‘Her house was no longer hers entirely:’ Legal Classification and the Law of Intestacy in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando”Katherine Gilbert, Drury University, “‘There is no private life which has not been determined by a wider public life:’ George Eliot’s Felix Holt (1866)” 10:45-11:00 Break Coffee/Tea SECOND SET OF PANELS 11:00-12:15 Panel 1: Literature, Law and Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure:… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
City of Philadephia last term, but decided it was unnecessary to resolve and left the question for another day. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
LarryBalding, Office of the Chief MedicalExaminer, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma(Jan. 31, 2001)........................................................34Burke, Sheila, Tennessee Will Lift Ban onExecutions, Tennessean, May 1, 2007...................18Clinesmith, Sonja, Moans Pierced SilenceDuring Wait, Arkansas Democrat Gazette,Jan. 26, 1992..........................................................29Diel, Stan, State's New Execution ProcedureDetailed, Birmingham… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
The court summarily reversed rulings adverse to police officers in two qualified immunity cases, City of Tahlequah, Oklahoma v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
There are, however, regular exceptions, such as Williams v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Respondents William Kivett and Bernard and Lisa Bravo filed a class action (which the district court later certified) against mortgage lender Flagstar for not paying interest on their escrow accounts. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
Virginia ― solely because his impairment originated at age 20 rather than before age 18; and (2) whether the 8th Circuit erred in concluding, like other circuits but unlike numerous state courts of last resort, that notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s recent teaching concerning the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, its 70-year-old decision in Williams v. [read post]