Search for: "WILLIAMS v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 13,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Correctional Admin., 892 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2018) (“materially changes” employment conditions in a manner “more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or an alteration of job responsibilities”); Williams v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
1.SCOTUS will hear Fischer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
See also United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and William D. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and William D. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm
The 55-page ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
That is a lesson from John Courtney Murray.Murray died in 1967, before Pope Paul VI issued his famous letter against contraception and the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Also, see Contract Services Employee Trust v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:40 pm
JURIST Deputy Editorial Director William Hibbitts contributed to this report. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
Amant v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:12 am
Ct.), with introductory note by Juan Pablo Gomez-Moreno The Foreign State Immunity Law of the People's Republic of China, with introductory note by William S. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
