Search for: "WILLIAMS v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Workerscompensation — Covered employee — Independent contractor William H. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:49 am by Gerald Gregory Lutkenhaus
Williams issued the opinion for the Commission, ultimately deciding that the employer was liable for workerscompensation and stated that it didn’t matter who footed the bill for the cell phone, what mattered in this case was Ms. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:02 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF: KIRK JACOBS v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:09 am by David DePaolo
Workers' compensation tends to reflect that. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:22 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Cook County Commission on Human Rights, Case No. 114876 - May the Cook County Commission on Human Rights award punitive damages? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:08 pm by Alison Rowe
 The Texas WorkersCompensation Act allows employers to elect whether or not they will subscribe to worker’s compensation insurance. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:38 pm by Meg Martin
The WorkersCompensation Division (the Division) found the injury to be compensable and awarded benefits. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:35 am by Mark S. Humphreys
When Essie filed a claim for benefits with the Worker's Compensation Commission, she ultimately prevailed. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am by Bernard Bell
  The existence of workerscompensation systems, while generally salutary, limits employers’ safety incentives by removing the risk of full tort damages for workers’ injuries. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:12 am by David DePaolo
Workers' Compensation Commission, Adcock injured his right knee on the job, and his doctor imposed limitations on his ability to twist, kneel, or walk extensively.In order to accommodate his restrictions, Knaack, Adcock's employer, provided him with a wheeled stool so he could move about his workspace in a seated position. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:43 am by Tom Pritchard
  Counsel presented case law that the ordinary meaning of the words and legislative history supported a broad interpretation of the phrase (Hobbs v Winchester Corpn [1910] 2 KB 471, Place v Rawtenstall Corpn (1916) 86 LJKB 90, Clayton v Sale Urban District Council [1926] 1 KB 415 and Neath Rural District Council v Williams [1951] 1 KB 115). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Don Cruse
Remand in light of Lawton‘s clarification of the 60-day period for a carrier to challenge compensability Zenith Insurance Co. v. [read post]