Search for: "WILLIAMSON v. STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Here, former counsel established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter [*2]of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating that their actions did not proximately cause the plaintiff’s alleged damages, and that subsequent counsel had a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiff’s rights (see Parklex Assoc. v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 AD3d 968, 970; Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:30 am
Williamson County Appraisal District, et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
Green v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
The high court took up the case to reconsider its 1985 decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
Two Ass'n v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:13 pm
In Knick, the Court overruled a Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
New Mexico State Police Officers Janice Madrid and Richard Williamson went to an Albuquerque apartment complex with a warrant to arrest a woman there. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Under Texas Rule 11, "a settlement agreement is enforceable only if it is (1) `in writing, signed[,] and filed with the papers as part of the record' or (2) `made in open court and entered of record.'" Williamson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
In Flying J Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:25 am
Williamson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133–35 (2000). [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 11:14 am
Crouch Railway Consulting, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
Williamson, 945 So. 2d 429, 435 (Miss. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm
So today, along comes Williamson v. [read post]
