Search for: "WILLIAMSON v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am by Jackie McDermott
In the United States, to implement such a system via constitutional amendment, the process laid out by Article V requires that two-thirds of both houses of Congress propose the amendment, or that the amendment arises from a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
First, the majority stated that the Williamson County holding was not consistent with precedent or workable for litigants, as illuminated by San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 12:04 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Knick overruled the 34-year-old precedent in Williamson County requiring that federal takings claimants seek compensation in state court before being allowed to proceed in federal court. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 5:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Knick overruled the 34-year-old precedent in Williamson County requiring that federal takings claimants seek compensation in state court before being allowed to proceed in federal court. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
"Today's decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the Court will overrule next…" The next overrule came last week: a 5-4 decision along ideological lines that scrapped Williamson County v. [read post]