Search for: "WILLIAMSON v. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 944
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am
For nearly 36 years, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed, relying on Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 4:06 pm
Knick v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
In Knick, the Court wiped out the “state-litigation requirement” of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
The high court took up the case to reconsider its 1985 decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 11:45 am
” The decision overturned Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
Here is the key part of the opinion: In Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:11 am
overruled the state-litigation prong of the Williamson County ripeness doctrine. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 7:16 am
P. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 7:16 am
P. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 3:44 am
Herman v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 2:05 pm
With the opinion in the Knick v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 2:05 pm
With the opinion in the Knick v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 12:07 pm
Supreme Court held it was a "search" when law enforcement attached a GPS device to a suspect's car, United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 12:07 pm
Supreme Court held it was a "search" when law enforcement attached a GPS device to a suspect's car, United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
”) Williamson v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:16 pm
Williamson v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 7:52 pm
FDA v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:00 am
Williamson ruled that a claim against a truck driver's employer for negligent hiring, retention, supervision or entrustment cannot stand in the absence of a related claim for punitive damages.In the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
