Search for: "WILLING v. U S" Results 161 - 180 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 8:37 pm by Dennis Crouch
U. of Illinois Found., 402 U.S. 313, 332–33 (1971). [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 50825(U)(Fam Ct.,2020) the Court observed that the purpose of a forensic evaluation in court for purposes of therapeutic interventions Cthat is the parents= responsibility. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm by John Rubin
Defendant’s confession was induced by hope instilled by the interrogators and in the totality of circumstances was not voluntary; murder conviction and life without parole sentence reversed State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]