Search for: "WOLF v. GILLS"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2017, 7:28 am
But in considering Gill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court agreed to hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
On Tuesday, the justices heard oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the court could announce today whether it will review a lower court decision holding that Wisconsin’s “redistricting plan violated the Constitution’s First Amendment and equal rights protections because of partisan gerrymandering”; he explains that the case, Gill v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that a three-judge panel on Thursday chose not to enter a preliminary injunction declaring Maryland’s sixth congressional district an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander; the court put further proceedings on hold pending the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and a partisan-gerrymandering case from North Carolina back for reconsideration in light of Gill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At RealClear Politics, Matt Walter weighs in on Gill v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
Writing for The Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog, Bernard Grofman parses last term’s partisan-gerrymandering decisions in Gill v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg suggests that “[c]ataloging some of the instances where courts incorporate math helps illuminate how the Court should proceed in Gill v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
” At FiveThirtyEight, Galen Druke “outline[s] seven potential paths the court could take,” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
” Commentary on the grant in Benisek comes from Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who notes “several differences” between Benisek and the court’s other pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” At The Hill, Jacqueline Thomsen reports that “[a] top sociology group fired back at Supreme Court Justice John Roberts for referring to sociology as “’gobbledygook’” during the oral argument last week in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “if the justices don’t reach a final conclusion” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
Benisek v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse remarks on the differences between the court’s two pending partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr notes that the Supreme Court’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
