Search for: "Wade v. District of Columbia" Results 121 - 140 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Such laws are increasingly common; it will be interesting to see whether the Court wants to wade into the abortion thicket again. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am by Michael Klarman
At the time of the decisions, thirteen states and the District of Columbia recognized same-sex marriage. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Do read Marie-Andrée’s report of the decision just issued by the Southern District Court of New York (SDNY) if you want to know! [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:28 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Avanti Capital Partners, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, Highland Residential, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, and Ivan Wade Brown, an IndividualCase number: 12-cv-00788 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: August 13, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: April 24, 2014 6/19/2014 9/17/2014 2014-69 SEC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Fuqi International, Inc. and Yu Kwai ChongCase number: 13-cv-0995 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia)Case filed: July 1, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: August 7, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-68 SEC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:25 am by admin
And as Justice Scalia pointed out in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by Ronald Collins
Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:44 am by Kat Noel, New York Civil Liberties Union
Please join me in telling Congress to refuse to reinstate the District of Columbia abortion ban by taking action today. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Two years ago, when the Supreme Court decided in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]