Search for: "Waite v. Macy"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2013, 1:21 pm
Macy’s, Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
In Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:20 pm
In Macy v Holder, the commission addressed a purely jurisdictional question, finding that a transgender male-to-female federal applicant’s complaint of discrimination because she is transgender could be processed under EEOC procedures. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Macy’s Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:36 pm
In Owen v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
Macy’s, which recognized that an employer can lawfully fix the date on which vacation pay begins to accrue; in Owen, the employer imposed a waiting period of six months before vacation pay began to accrue. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
Macy’s, which recognized that an employer can lawfully fix the date on which vacation pay begins to accrue; in Owen, the employer imposed a waiting period of six months before vacation pay began to accrue. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:14 am
In Macy v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:54 pm
Moreover, even more recently, on April 20, 2012, the EEOC, in deciding a case involving the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, held in Macy v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm
Vernor v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm
Panel on “fluid,” legacy & heritage marks – @MariaBaratta discussing Macy’s v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
When Macy’s offered the book for 89 cents, the publisher sued. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:58 pm
In 2012, the EEOC used the same logic in Macy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:56 am
(The case is Electronic Data Sys Corp v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
Penney, Kohl’s, Macy’s, and Sears for violating California’s Unfair Competition law, Cal. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
Chris Clarkson, a loss-prevention agent employed by Macy's department store, watched as Gunnell, McAlmont, and Patterson grabbed clothing from the racks and ran from the store to a waiting car driven by Manns. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Justice Kennedy also found unpersuasive Vermont’s counterargument that respondent has not shown that the State scheme has caused it to suffer economic costs, stating that Liberty Mutual need not wait to bring its pre-emption claim until confronted with numerous inconsistent obligations and encumbered with any ensuing costs. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
Sometimes, we’ll even make you wait for much-needed legal news. [read post]
