Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores East LP" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:57 am by Mark Hartsoe
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, August 6, 2014, Knoxville Injury Lawyer Blog Knoxville Court Sides With Insurer in Wrongful Death Case: Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:53 am by Mark Hartsoe
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, August 6, 2014, Knoxville Injury Lawyer Blog Knoxville Court Sides With Insurer in Wrongful Death Case: Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:32 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a woman alleged in federal court that she sustained personal injuries when a large bottle of shampoo fell on her head while shopping at a Tennessee department store. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:24 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP The first case involves a 2010 incident at a Wal-Mart in Snellville. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Southern District of Alabama found  (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 9:08 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP ("The plaintiff in this premises liability action... appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant.... [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:20 am by Ron Miller
In Osterhout v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, the giant retailer was denied its motion to dismiss an employee’s age, gender and disability discrimination and FMLA interference and retaliation claims based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel despite her failure to disclose those claims in bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:09 pm by Law Lady
WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP, Appellee. 2nd District.Torts -- Automobile accident -- Rear-end collision -- Evidence -- Damages -- Claim that trial court, in granting plaintiff's motion in limine, improperly precluded defendants from presenting testimony that the amount of damages plaintiff was claiming was not reasonable or necessary for the injuries at issue was not preserved for appeal where no transcript of hearing on motion in limine was in the record… [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]