Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores East LP"
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 2:24 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP The first case involves a 2010 incident at a Wal-Mart in Snellville. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
The Southern District of Alabama found (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:14 am
., Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, SDAla, March 26, 2013). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:20 am
In Osterhout v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, the giant retailer was denied its motion to dismiss an employee’s age, gender and disability discrimination and FMLA interference and retaliation claims based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel despite her failure to disclose those claims in bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:09 pm
WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP, Appellee. 2nd District.Torts -- Automobile accident -- Rear-end collision -- Evidence -- Damages -- Claim that trial court, in granting plaintiff's motion in limine, improperly precluded defendants from presenting testimony that the amount of damages plaintiff was claiming was not reasonable or necessary for the injuries at issue was not preserved for appeal where no transcript of hearing on motion in limine was in the… [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 298 S.W.3d 473, 479 (Mo.banc 2009). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:16 pm
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (3D08-3219), the Third District reversed the entry of a temporary injunction. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
About a month ago, the Nevada Supreme Court took a look at the so-called "heeding presumption" - and rejected it outright. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:46 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/18/2006 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]