Search for: "Wales v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 11:15 am by Unknown
"'Pattern of Discrimination': The United States, Refugees and Barriers to Asylum," University of New South Wales Law Journal Student Series, no. 8 (2020) [full-text]Policies Affecting Asylum Seekers at the Border: The Migrant Protection Protocols, Prompt Asylum Claim Review, Humanitarian Asylum Review Process, Metering, Asylum Transit Ban, and How They Interact (American Immigration Council, Jan. 2020) [text]Use of Video in Place of In-Person… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:11 am by Andres Guadamuz
While most of the attention regarding artificial intelligence and copyright has been centred in the United States, it’s useful to remember that one of the main pieces of litigation is taking place in the courts of England and Wales. [read post]
And secondly, decisions taken outside the jurisdiction of England and Wales that have a legal consequence inside this jurisdiction are justiciable by the courts – the fact that the decision was taken outside of England and Wales was irrelevant in this case. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
He also reasoned that TULCRA regulates the procedures for dismissal on the grounds of redundancy of employees at institutions in England, Wales and Scotland. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
". * The United States was a sovereign state but Kentucky was just one of its constituent territories. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Accordingly, on 21 June 2018, General Dynamics issued proceedings to enforce the Award in England and Wales, where it believes Libya to hold relevant assets. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
In early December 2020, rising cases of COVID, new lockdowns, and BREXIT trade talks that went down to the wire were briefly displaced from the headlines after the High Court of England and Wales published a judgment in the case of Bell v Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust. [read post]