Search for: "Walker v. City of Birmingham"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
City of St. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
It is curated by Mary Ziegler, UC Davis School of Law (Harvard Gazette).Randall Kennedy, HLS, interviewed on Walker v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 9:20 am
City of Birmingham (1967): [In Walker], Birmingham officials obtained an injunction prohibiting Dr. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:44 pm
Walker-Thomas Furniture Company in the context of a statutory transformation of consumer protection law. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
Birmingham, 376 U.S. 339 (1964). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
On Thursday 31 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Samuels v Birmingham City Council. [read post]
6 May 2018, 6:19 pm
Given the collateral bar rule (illustrated by Walker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:44 pm
In a current work-in-progress, I discuss Walker v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
City of Birmingham (1967) and Shuttlesworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
In Walker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
” (p 517)While this was a different statutory context, it was helpful on the ordinary use of language in an analogous context.Appeal upheld.Lord Walker agreed with Lord Carnwath.Lope Hope also agreed with Lord Carnwath, adding:There are, nevertheless, two yardsticks that can be applied. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
” (p 517)While this was a different statutory context, it was helpful on the ordinary use of language in an analogous context.Appeal upheld.Lord Walker agreed with Lord Carnwath.Lope Hope also agreed with Lord Carnwath, adding:There are, nevertheless, two yardsticks that can be applied. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:25 am
Under Walker v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & ors, heard 11 July 2012. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 in Courtroom 1 is the matter of Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & ors. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:03 pm
On tap today in civil procedure: the dispiriting Walker case, in which Justice Stewart holds that the collateral bar rule trumps the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
City of Birmingham, and the Letter from Birmingham Jail. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
City of Birmingham, 181 So.2d 493 (Ala. 1965), aff'd, 388 U.S. 307 (1967). [read post]
