Search for: "Walker v. City of Birmingham"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
The policy of the 1980 Act (consolidated in the 1985 Act) was to permit transmission of a secure tenancy by way of succession once: see Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] 2 AC 262. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
The policy of the 1980 Act (consolidated in the 1985 Act) was to permit transmission of a secure tenancy by way of succession once: see Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] 2 AC 262. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Walker W. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
City of Birmingham, and the Letter from Birmingham Jail. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
On Thursday 31 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Samuels v Birmingham City Council. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am
A person who discriminated on the ground of race, as defined by the Act, could not pray in aid the fact that the ground of discrimination was one mandated by religion (R v Birmingham City Council Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission (No1) (1989) AC 1155 HL and James v Eastleigh BC (1990) 2 AC 751 HL). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant, BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Federal jurisdiction -- Torts -- Removal of state court action to federal court -- Timeliness -- Appellate court need not decide whether defendant's notice of removal was timely in instant case because any error in failing to remand case to state court on ground that notice of removal was untimely would be procedural error and would be insufficient to… [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
” (p 517)While this was a different statutory context, it was helpful on the ordinary use of language in an analogous context.Appeal upheld.Lord Walker agreed with Lord Carnwath.Lope Hope also agreed with Lord Carnwath, adding:There are, nevertheless, two yardsticks that can be applied. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
” (p 517)While this was a different statutory context, it was helpful on the ordinary use of language in an analogous context.Appeal upheld.Lord Walker agreed with Lord Carnwath.Lope Hope also agreed with Lord Carnwath, adding:There are, nevertheless, two yardsticks that can be applied. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 9:20 am
City of Birmingham (1967): [In Walker], Birmingham officials obtained an injunction prohibiting Dr. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The field is situated immediately adjacent to the Trout Run Trail, an eight-mile public trail for bicyclists, walkers and runners that circles the city of Decorah. [read post]
