Search for: "Walker v. Collins" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 12:46 am
  The panel consisted of Lords Hope, Saville, Walker, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 11:20 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court-appointed amicus brief in Collins v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
   It will be heard by Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Kerr and Clarke. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:51 am
  by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:53 am
From Tuesday 1 to Thursday 3 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Hope and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY [...] [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:45 pm
  In Courtroom 1, Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker, Collins, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 from Monday 21 to Tuesday 22 February 2011. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
On 27 July, amidst the traditional flurry of judgments handed down at the end of the Trinity term, a 7 strong Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker, Hale, Mance, Collins and Clarke) gave its ruling in the Belmont Park case, concerning the applicability of the principle of the common law on insolvency known as the ”anti-deprivation rule”. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:36 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Collins, No. 19-184 are military cases involving the statute of limitations for rape under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.Walker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Running from Monday 21 May until Thursday 24 May 2012 is the appeal of Rubin & anor v Eurofinance SA & ors, to be heard in Courtroom 1 of the Supreme Court by Lords Walker, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Collins. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
There are two appeals in the Supreme Court beginning with Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company to be heard on Monday 18 to Wednesday 20 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Neuberger, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
  This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am by Laura Sandwell
In Courtroom 1 from Monday 31 October Lords Hope, Walker, Clarke, Dyson and Collins will hear Lehman Brothers International v CRC Credit Fund Limited and GLC Investments PLC Sub Fund – European Equity Fund over four days. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
Last week a five-judge bench consisting of Lords Walker, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Collins heard an appeal in what is likely to become a landmark case in private international law and, specifically, cross-border insolvency. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
There is only one Supreme Court appeal in the second week of the Easter Term, commencing with a two-day hearing of Autoclenz Limited v Belcher and others to be heard by Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Clarke and Sir Nicholas Wilson on Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 May 2011. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Lord [Sky]Walker and Lord Collins wrote the judgment of the court, with Lady Hale and Lord Phillips agreeing in full. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Collins agreed with Lord Walker and Lady Hale, and added some reflections of his own. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
Lords Walker, Mance and Collins held that: “the application did not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
As we’ve previously noted, the House of Lords in Doherty did little to actually make things clear, so Hillingdon v Collins is an important judgment. [read post]