Search for: "Walker v. Nelson"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 9:54 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Tanika Walker v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:33 pm
The ruling in Baker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:09 am
Back in September, Dean Eboni Nelson posted on Duncan Kennedy's The Bitter Ironies of Williams v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:47 am
Emerson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
Constitutional scholar Vikram Amar said that Walker will have to determine whether Baker v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:34 am
Nelson had not been a considered opinion, Walker said, but rather issued without comment. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:30 am
Eboni Nelson One would be hard pressed to find a law school graduate in the past half century who was not aware of the Williams v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm
In a landmark decision in Perry v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:57 am
Nelson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
" Judge Walker also appointed Gretchen Nelson as substitute class counsel, replacing Kamber Edelson (whom he had provisionally appointed when he initially approved the original settlement). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am
In today’s Washington Post, Edwin Meese has an op-ed piece in which he argues that Judge Walker’s decision ignored binding Supreme Court precedent – namely, Baker v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:39 am
It deals with Baker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:47 pm
Second, Prop 8 backers argue that Baker v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:31 am
In a landmark decision in Perry v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:16 pm
Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)], the defense contends that Walker must hew to that precedent and reject the plaintiffs' constitutional claims. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
Nelson (409 U.S. 410), dismissing an appeal “for want of a substantial federal question. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:15 pm
Tyrone Walker, No. 110,712 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; first-degree murderCarol Longenecker SchmidtFailure to give lesser-included offense instructionImproper prosecutorial argumentFailure to grant motion to suppressSeptember 16--Wednesday--a.m.State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:07 am
They maintained that Baker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
LEAD AGENCY Nelson v. [read post]
