Search for: "Walker v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 2,066
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
   Phillip Foner and George Walker published a two-volume set of the Proceedings of the Black National and State Conventions in 1980, but those documents are indifferently edited and the book has become difficult to find. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “A highly anticipated first summit meeting between President Biden and President Vladimir V. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The company argued that it used business judgment in making these hiring decisions, and that it had a policy of not rehiring employees into lesser titles that would amount to demotions for the candidate.The Court of Appeals (Walker, Park and Nardini) held as follows: first, it noted that the Second Circuit stated in Byrnie v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am by Matthew Schutte
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) transferred Ronald Chandler et. al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am by Matthew Schutte
The plaintiffs, Chandler Manufacturing and Supertherm Fluid Heating Services (collectively Chandler), alleged that the defendant, Phoenix Services, continued enforcement of the ‘933 patent on their website and that this conduct constituted an antitrust violation under Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The plaintiffs, Chandler Manufacturing and Supertherm Fluid Heating Services (collectively Chandler), alleged that the defendant, Phoenix Services, continued enforcement of the ‘933 patent on their website and that this conduct constituted an antitrust violation under Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by vforberger
At present, current unemployment law prohibits consideration of licensing requirements or other state or federal law in determining employee status. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On a motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence under CPLR §3211[a][1], dismissal is only warranted if the documentary evidence submitted conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Walker v. [read post]