Search for: "Walker v. Walker" Results 81 - 100 of 4,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Karen Orren and Christopher Walker, University of California, Los Angeles, have posted an abstract for Cold Case File: Indictable Acts and Officer Accountability in Marbury v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Karen Orren and Christopher Walker, University of California, Los Angeles, have posted an abstract for Cold Case File: Indictable Acts and Officer Accountability in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:34 am by traceydennis
Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 plc (in substitution for Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd) v Walker and another [2010] UKSC 32; [2010] WLR (D) 175 “A credit broker administration fee and the interest payable on it were properly included in the charge for credit within the meaning of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 and the Consumer Credit (Total Charge for Credit) Regulations 1980, and accordingly, since those items did not form part of the amount of credit as set out in a… [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Walker Process lawsuits get their name from the 1965 Supreme Court decision Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:38 pm
Walker, 66 M.J. 721 (N-M. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:25 am by Daily Record Staff
This appeal arises from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County that reversed the decision of appellant, the Board of Appeals of the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (“Board”), concerning appellee’s, Shelton Walker’s,1 claim for unemployment benefits. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:55 am
R (James) v Secretary of State for Justice (Parole Board intervening); R (Lee) v Same (Same intervening); R (Wells) v Same (Same intervening) (on appeal from R (Walker) v Same (Same intervening)) [2009] UKHL 22; [2009] WLR (D) 145 “The failure of the Secretary of State for Justice to provide courses to enable prisoners serving indeterminate [...] [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 am by INFORRM
  Politicians are expected to “have the thickest skins” – draws attention to cases such Lingens v Austria, Reynolds v Times Newspapers and discussion in the Von Hannover case. [read post]