Search for: "Wallace v. Wallace" Results 261 - 280 of 1,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
” Georgia: Stock Redemption Agreement’s “Current Value” Pricing Provision Excludes Minority Discount Wallace v Wallace, 813 S.E.2d 428 [Ct. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:06 am by scanner1
Wallace DA 17-0015 2019 MT 12N Criminal – Sexual Abuse of Children Munoz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:00 pm by Paul Caron
Rev. 179 (2017)): In its 2011 decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:30 am by Kristin Hickman
Kristin Hickman In its 2011 decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 193482 (ND CA, Nov. 13, 2018), a California federal court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not permitted to change his name or purchase religious items, and for retaliation.In Wallace v. [read post]