Search for: "Walling v. Michigan" Results 41 - 60 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2013, 6:26 am by Keith R. Fisher
  Since then, the complaint was amended twice, and a number of states – Alabama, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and West Virginia – joined the case as parties plaintiff and added some refinements to the original causes of action. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:08 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 169906 (WD VA, Nov. 29, 2012), a Virginia federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that defendants told him that Satanism is not a religion recognized by the Department of Corrections and refused to allow him to order a Goat Head Star Amulet.In Wall v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 2:13 pm by Joe Patrice
[Excess of Democracy] * How terrifying is Heien v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:44 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Today, the last day of the term, the SCOTUS announced its 6-2 decision in Voisine v United States which expanded a federal firearm prohibition to include crimes of domestic violence. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
This post examines a recent opinion from the Michigan Court of Appeals:  Rooks v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Courts have split on the question, and University of Michigan law professor Jessica Litman recaps the Supreme Court’s discussion. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
Especially when, as here, the circuit precedent on the issue seems to be somewhat of an outlier.I imagine that Judge Graber will call for an en banc vote -- otherwise why write the concurrence -- unless the handwriting on the wall is crystal clear (and perhaps even then).  [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am by Josh Blackman
(The Supreme Court addressed the complicated structure of Michigan's educational system in Schuette v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
At the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Ashby Jones sums up the Court’s message for Microsoft in Microsoft v. i4i pretty succinctly: “You got a problem with this, take it up with Congress, not us.” [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am by Burt Neuborne
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and McConnell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
The AP has this article on Azimi v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:06 am by Jeffrey Rosen
For all these reasons, the writing was on the wall for the “political process” doctrine long before an appeals court invoked it to strike down Michigan’s affirmative action ban in 2012. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Federal Trade Commission] “After all, a wall can be built around many things, but not around the First Amendment. [read post]