Search for: "Walter J. Andrews"
Results 101 - 120
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
” At first instance, Meade J held that the Patent was invalid for lack of plausibility and lack of technical contribution over the prior art. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:53 pm
Davidow 202-223-7380 cdavidow@paulweiss.com Andrew J. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Briefly: Jonathan Macey of this blog and Walter Olson at Cato@Liberty analyze Wednesday’s opinion in Gabelli v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:11 am
Breheny, and Andrew J. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Evan J. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
In The Paris Review, Joshua J. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
Bacon J rejected this proposition at first instance. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
., 1949-Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010.CorporationsKF1422 .E38 2010Corporate governance : principles and practices / Walter Effross.Effross, Walter, 1963-New York : Aspen Publishers, 2010.Criminal LawKKW110.D45 A3 2008Madame Prosecutor : confrontations with humanity's worst criminals and the culture of impunity : a memoir / Carla Del Ponte ; with Chuck Sudetic.Del Ponte, Carla.New York : Other Press, c2008.Criminal LawKF9219.85 .L34 2010Principles of… [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
On May 23, 2016, in an interesting development in one of the more high profile lawsuits to arise out of the financial crisis, the Second Circuit reversed the $1.27 billion civil penalty that Southern District of New York Judge Jed Rakoff imposed on Countrywide and several related defendants in a case involving the company’s sale of mortgages to government sponsored entities. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:23 pm
" Federal judge Andrew J. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:44 am
Speakers Speaker: Professor Andrew W. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
• Walter L. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
In Optis v Apple, Meade J explained that the date of hand-down itself is not necessarily confidential. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm
Davidow 202-223-7380cdavidow@paulweiss.com Andrew J. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
” On defendants’ motion to dismiss, the district court (Crotty, J.) rejected defendants’ argument that these statements were inactionable puffery, but did dismiss claims related to Goldman Sachs’s failure to disclose its receipt of a “Wells Notice” from the SEC.[2] Plaintiffs moved for class certification, relying upon Basic’s fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance.[3] In opposing class certification, defendants attempted to rebut the… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 5:09 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.) dismissed the complaint, holding, inter alia, that plaintiffs had failed to allege subjective and objective falsity as to defendants’ projections and statements of opinion. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Andrews, Kenneth R. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Merial - represented by big guns Andrew Waugh QC and Tom Hinchliffe (3 New Square) - appealed arguing that Mr Justice Floyd errored in principle in finding that the '564 was invalid for insufficiency and in ordering Merial to pay 40% of Omnipharm's costs (excluding the costs of various interim applications). [read post]
