Search for: "Walter Olson"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2007, 9:41 am
THE GOVERNMENT AND DANGEROUS PRODUCTS: Walter Olson asks: Is government the problem? [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 4:56 am
” Now Walter Olson reports and links on further developments and thoughts as follows: Nowhere to hide: When your litigation opponent subpoenas your Facebook, Amazon, [...] [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm
Via Walter Olson. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:33 pm
Full Analysis of Lebron Opinion (which includes the court's full opinion) Opposing View from Walter Olson on Point of Law [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:15 pm
For criticism of the proposal, see: Ted Frank, Trial Lawyer Earmarks: Ending Deductions for Punitive Damage Payments (Overlawyered) Walter Olson, Ending Deductibility of Punitive Damages (Point of... [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:03 am
As Walter Olson notes, the Food and Drug Administration appears to be moving ahead with plans to force gradual reductions in the salt content of processed foods.” Are tar and feathers regulated? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:04 am
Walter Olson rounds it up: Ralph Lauren lawyers: don’t you dare reproduce our skinny-model photo in the course of criticizing our use of skinny models [BoingBoing] With photoshop, evidently, quite a bit! [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 7:00 am
I am thrilled (that is no exaggeration) to report that I will be guest-blogging from December 19 through December 25 as a [woefully inadequate] substitute for Walter Olson at the indispensable Overlawyered. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
In kindly linking to my earlier post that mocked NPR's unquestioning acceptance of a plaintiff's claim that her lawsuit was "not about the money," Overlawyered's Walter Olson reveals his archive of "not-about-the-money" claims by plaintiffs. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:27 am
Walter Olson of PointofLaw.Com writes about a tax break that is in the works for trial lawyers: [T]he litigation lobby is quietly preparing to push through a $1.6 billion (with a “b”) tax break for contingent-fee lawyers that would let them deduct expenses as made, rather than in the year of settling a suit. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 12:17 am
ABC News: Congress Grills IRS Chief Over Missing Emails Sharyll Attkisson: Democrats Apologize to IRS Commissioner at Hearing on Lost Emails Bloomberg: Camp Calls for Special Prosecutor in Missing IRS E-Mails Cato at Liberty: Kim Strassel and the WSJ on the Lost IRS Emails, by Walter Olson CNN: What's Up... [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 5:49 am
Walter Olson at Cato has the following reflection on the recent round of election reform in which he cautions commentators to distinguish “ambitious” reforms that “abolish[] party primaries and then employ[] RCV in a general election” (like in Alaska)… Continue reading The post “A Setback for Election Reformers? [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 2:13 pm
” A discussion with Jeanine Abrams McLean of FairCount, Dan McLaughlin of National Review, and Walter Olson of Cato, moderated… Continue reading The post “Election Integrity: How Do We Restore Faith in Our Election System? [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:59 am
I recently read Walter Olson's (Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute) op-ed in Times of London. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
In tomorrow's WSJ, the Cato Institute's Walter Olson explains why the Supreme Court's landmark decision in OBergefell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
That should make for a start at least. https://t.co/g0QKura7op — Walter Olson (@walterolson) February 21, 2017 Walter did not pull any punches in his book chapter. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
That should make for a start at least. https://t.co/g0QKura7op — Walter Olson (@walterolson) February 21, 2017 Walter did not pull any punches in his book chapter. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:48 am
Walter Olson, long time tort “reformer” and my occasional sparring partner, has moved from the Manhattan Institute (and his home base at Point of Law) to the Cato Institute. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:54 am
Case in point, from Walter Olson: Surprisingly or otherwise, some big business groups like the Grocery Manufacturers of America have allied with consistent Big Government advocacy groups like the Consumer Federation of America and Center for Science in the Public Interest to push S. 510, the food safety bill pending before the Senate (which might win consideration in the lame-duck session). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:55 am
Walter Olson asks what we’re getting from our medical malpractice system — with “jury trials, contingency fees, lack of loser-pays, extensive lawyer-driven discovery” — that Canada, at 10% of the cost for its medical malpractice system does not. [read post]
