Search for: "Walter Olson" Results 341 - 360 of 1,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Quite some time ago, friend of the blog Walter Olson of Overlawered opined on the proposed revisions to the DSM-IV, soon to be the DSM-5, which will apparently include some brand new mental disorders therein. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:28 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Coleman and Walter Olson both seem on board with, as Olson words it, "steering rights owners into agency complaints or arbitration as an alternative, or at least precondition, to court action. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:59 am by Jon Hyman
ADA’s 20th Anniversary – from Walter Olson ADA’s anniversary, cont’d – from Overlawyered ADA Turns 20, Still Has Growing Up To Do – from Workplace Diva ADA anniversary approaches – from Warren & Hays Employment Law Blog EEOC Celebrates 20th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act – from Wyatt Employment Law Report Here’s the rest of what I read this week. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 7:26 am
Walter Olson at Point of Law explores the question of whether the inflammatory rhetoric that's hit the fan this week violates a legal duty, under an incitement to riot analysis as argued by Susan Kuo at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
Overlawyered's Walter Olson succinctly aggregated some cases, including: * RSA Enterprises v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:29 am by Robin Shea
Walter Olson of the great Overlawyered.com sent a challenge over Twitter earlier this week: For those of you who don’t know Mr. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:53 am
(And it did have the side effect of getting Walter Olson to join Facebook.) [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 4:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
His excellent post begins: To the extent America has made progress in recent years in rolling back the extreme litigiousness of earlier years, one main reason has been the courts’ increased... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 5:03 am
Our editor, Walter Olson, in today's Wall Street Journal:A few observations: • Phrases like "Do you realize I'm a lawyer? [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:09 am by Ted Frank
Walter Olson calls our attention to this week's Ninth Circuit decision Antoninetti v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:28 am by Mark Bennett
In The Ethics of Pathos, Part I I discussed Walter Olson's ethical question, "Should lawyers trying cases make an appeal to jurors' reptile brains? [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 4:27 am
I want to thank Walter Olson and Ted Frank for honoring me by giving me an opportunity to guest blog here while Ted is away this week. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 2:25 am by Walter Olson
Description: Featuring Walter Olson, Senior Fellow, Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute & Editor, Overlawyered.com (@walterolson); Stacia Cosner, Deputy Director, Students for Sensible Drug Policy (@TheStacia); Michelle Minton, Fellow in Consumer Policy Studies, Competitive Enterprise Institute (@michelleminton); moderated by Kat Murti, Digital Marketing Manager, Cato Institute (@KatMurti). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
  You’ll recall that back in early December, we were named one of the top 100 legal blogs by the editors of the ABA Journal, and as a part of that, we were placed into a category with five other well regarded Torts blogs, including our friends Walter Olson of Overlawyered, J. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Gerald Russello
It has been a great week co-guest blogging here, and thanks to Walter Olson for making it happen and to my co-guest blogger James Maxeiner. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:43 am
WhiteCoat (and later Walter Olson) directed me to this op-ed in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette by Gerald F. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:15 pm
Walter Olson reports at Point of Law that 2nd Circuit Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs claims he was quoted "grossly" out of context when he made critical remarks about pro bono work and impact litigation at a Federalist Society event in Rochester. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 3:54 am by SHG
At the Bulwark, Walter Olson offers an interesting post about the trio of cases argued before the Supreme Court this week, characterizing the issue as the “surprise plain meaning” approach to textualism. [read post]