Search for: "Ward v. Harte"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 6:06 am
FRANK FRASCELLA, HONORABLE SKILLMAN, HONORABLE GILROY, MICHAEL RICCIARDULLI, KARIN WARD, RUPRECHT, HART & WEEKS, LLP, HONORABLE VICHNESS, App. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:10 am
FRANK FRASCELLA, HONORABLE SKILLMAN, HONORABLE GILROY, MICHAEL RICCIARDULLI, KARIN WARD, RUPRECHT, HART & WEEKS, LLP, HONORABLE VICHNESS, App. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:08 am
FRANK FRASCELLA, HONORABLE SKILLMAN, HONORABLE GILROY, MICHAEL RICCIARDULLI, KARIN WARD, RUPRECHT, HART & WEEKS, LLP, HONORABLE VICHNESS, App. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 12:08 pm
Ian Ward is Professor of Law at Newcastle University, and the author of a number of books on law, literature and history including 'Law and Literature: Possibilities and Perspectives' (Cambridge University Press, 1995), 'Shakespeare and the Legal Imagination' (Cambridge University Press, 1999), ‘The English Constitution: Myths and Realities' (Hart Publishing, 2004), 'Law, Text, Terror' (Cambridge University Press, 2009) and most recently 'Law and the Brontes' (Palgrave,… [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
See Hart v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
In Hart v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
Their Honours held that the defence should not be unduly restricted, and that even statements that are not central to the matter communicated may still be relevant and protected, as was the case in Adam v Ward. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:25 pm
" Hart v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
HART; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-04-00436-CV, 240 SW3d 16, 07-05-07)08-0077 DANIEL K. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
HART; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-04-00436-CV, 240 SW3d 16, 07-05-07)08-0077DANIEL K. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Graham v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Graham v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Latest Cases Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 – 21 December 2010, CA (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
This was the fifth libel case of 2015 – so far the claimants have won two and the defendants have won three (for the others see our post on Starr v Ward). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Hart v. [read post]
