Search for: "Ward v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm by Law Lady
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Appellee. 5th District.Venue -- Where settlement agreement, which had settled foreclosure action by mortgagor assigning to mortgagee 50 percent of the net proceeds awarded for damages in mortgagor's action against its insurance carrier in Miami-Dade County, contained mandatory venue selection provision requiring any litigation between mortgagor and mortgagee to be tried in Osceola County, trial court erred in denying motion to enforce the venue… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:39 am by Moseley Collins
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 1071, 1074-1077 [in upholding $150,000 in non-economic damages for slip-and-fall injury to legs and lower back of 55-year old woman, trial court remarked that the award was generous, where plaintiff suffered from ongoing, chronic, permanent pain from myofascial pain syndrome, which limited her mobility, caused her to be physically weak, and prevented her from working at her job]; Springmeyer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:49 pm by Kevin Funnell
” Moreover, the DOJ’s reliance on discretionary loan pricing by individual loan officers as evidence of intentional discrimination seems to be squarely contrary to the Supreme Court’s observation in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
In sum, these rulings, and a similarly pro-corporate, anti-litigant ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
After a long argument about grammar, the Court will decide whether a mandatory minimum ten-year sentence enhancement for a child-pornography conviction triggered by a prior state law conviction for sexual abuse applies even when the prior conviction did not “involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals,… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
The lawsuit also alleges that the park failed to inform Sacco or her daughter that they could buy a glow-in-the-dark “No Boo” necklace to ward off costumed employees. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
The lawsuit also alleges that the park failed to inform Sacco or her daughter that they could buy a glow-in-the-dark “No Boo” necklace to ward off costumed employees. [read post]