Search for: "Warden v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 8:17 am by Scott Michelman
And at the Supreme Court, it’s the rationale for a steady string of summary reversals, including yesterday’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
MarkDershwitz)..........................................................6, 22Trial Tr., Taylor v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 89225 (ED PA, June 30, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was unable to pray on a single day when he was kept in handcuffs for over two hours.In Taylor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm by cdw
Noncapital United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas,  2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000), because the petitioner here did not have a "nightmarish" childhood. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 754 So.2d 657 (Fla. 2000)........................3 Taylor v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Gee Jon, 211 P. 676 (Nev. 1923)..............3In re Storti, 60 N.E. 210 (Mass. 1901) ..................2 Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
" The law could be upheld only if the state could show it served a significant local interest that could not be furthered by a non-discriminatory law--this Oklahoma could not show.Maine v Taylor (1986) is a rare example of a Supeme Court decision upholding a state statute that discriminated against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Durston, as Warden of the State Prison at Auburn, N.Y. 2 v. (1889). [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and 2) a… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
” Week of October 18, 2010: In Favor of the Prosecution or Warden Jimmy Wayne Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Owner of two towing companies finds himself crosswise with both the Michigan State Police and the city of Taylor. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]