Search for: "Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Therefore, federal contractors faced with disparate impact claims under EO 11246 may choose to avail themselves of the defense contained in the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 8:25 am by Jennifer McNamee
Rodriguez (both Petitioner and Respondent) Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
Wards Cove Packing Co., 810 F.2d 1477, 1478–79 (9th Cir. 1987) (en banc)." [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:15 am by Richard S. Zackin
First, they provide that plaintiffs alleging that an age-neutral policy or practice has had a disparate impact on older workers have the burden to isolate and identify the specific policy or practice that allegedly caused the statistical disparities. 29 C.F.R. ยง 1625.7(c); Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:29 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
., the Civil Rights Act of 1991, statutorily reversing Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
When the Court abruptly changed its mind in 1989, effectively eviscerating the Griggs standard in Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]