Search for: "Warner v. Martin" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2011, 10:39 am by admin
Stark white, with blushed pink cheeks, a wide grin and a thin black mustache and goatee, the mask resonates with the hackers because it was worn by a rogue anarchist challenging an authoritarian government in “V for Vendetta,” the movie produced in 2006 by Warner Brothers. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However, back in 2009 the same estate had granted DreamWorks and Warner Bros a licence to reproduce King's speeches in a film that Steven Spielberg is set to produce but has yet to see the light. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:08 am by Kevin
How Martin Scorsese feels about this isn’t clear. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Netflix border crackdown cuts off some customers, but unblocking services fight back -> Happy Birthday: Warner offers up to $14M to settle copyright dispute -> Competition Tribunal continues to limit access to private ‘refusal to deal’ actions -> Martin Shkreli has a new problem: Artist sues over portraits on $2-million Wu-Tang Clan album -> Spray-on law: Even… [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
His single (with Connie Stevens) --"Kookie, Kookie (Lend Me Your Comb)" -- became the first hit single for the newly established Warner Bros. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
  Comcast and Time Warner now control half or more of all U.S. cable subscribers. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:14 am by Kali Borkoski
On March 25, the Justices will hear oral arguments in Sebelius v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
She shows my email address as, and then reminds the reader that Mandelman Inc. is a suspended corporation. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
 Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis appealAfter… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 2:35 pm
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
" A claim of false advertising may be based on at at least one of two theories (Time Warner Cable v DIRECTV (2007)):that the challenged ad is literally falsethat the ad, while not literally false, is nevertheless likely to mislead or confuse consumersThe claimant must demonstrate that the false or misleading representation involved an inherent or material quality of the product and that the injuries to be redressed are the result of "public deception" (Johnson &… [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
Marcella Favale, Martin Kretschmer and Paul C. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:17 am by Hayleigh Bosher
It also provides a useful guide on plausibility and comments on Warner-Lambert v Generics regarding plausibility and infringement of second medical use patents.The book comprises 24 chapters, and comprehensively covers each stage of the patent life - from application to infringement. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
She has now learned that the EPO has responded in the form of an email sent by Mr Guillaume Minnoye, Vice-President of Directorate General 1, which Merpel leaks here in all its majestic unbelievability.* No pain for Actavis: Warner-Lambert fail to stop launch of generic pregabalinSecond medical use claims, skinny labels, and public policy issues around healthcare are the topics addressed in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015]… [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:38 pm
”, taking place on 14 November 2018, will investigate and analyse the content and impact of the Supreme Court’s highly anticipated decision in Warner-Lambert v Mylan. [read post]