Search for: "Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:03 am
U.S. (06-1456) — definition of concealing crime proceeds under federal money-laundering law Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:04 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, 97 (2d Cir.2006)(same Michigan statute was not preempted by Buckman), affirmed sub nom, Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm
Most notoriously, the Supreme Court fought this issue to a 4-4 draw back in 2008 (in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
It involved a recurring question that the Supreme Court failed to address in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
It involved a recurring question that the Supreme Court failed to address in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
FERRER, ALEX E. | Questions Presented 06-1498 WARNER-LAMBERT CO., ET AL. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 6:19 pm
Indeed, the Court’s most recent preemption decision (Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:56 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
Supreme Court issued its ruling in the Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:04 am
Levine.Many folks have been reading the tea leaves to try to decide what the decisions in Riegel and Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2nd Cir., 2007), aff’d by an equally divided court sub nom, Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:52 pm
A group of Michigan plaintiffs led by Kimberly Kent in April 2000 sued Warner-Lambert Co. over alleged injuries caused by its Rezulin diabetes drug. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
In a second case, the Court divided evenly, 4-4, in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
Medtronic, Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Warner-Lambert Co. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
I noted all the commentary in the legal blogosphere over it, as Chief Justice Roberts stepped aside in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Kent was affirmed in an unpublished opinion. [read post]
