Search for: "Warwick Rothnie" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2006, 12:29 pm
Horsehair wig wearer Warwick Rothnie discusses a case brought by LVMH against an Australian 'trash and treasure' market. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 10:45 pm by Kim
Warwick Rothnie (first posts: October 2004) and I (first post: way back in June 2002 believe it or not) are starting to look like elder statespeople in the Australian IP blogosphere. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 3:01 pm
The Full Federal Court has now handed down its judgment in Woolworths Ltd v BP plc [2006] FCAFC 132 (hat tip: Warwick Rothnie). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Tom Mighell
Warwick Rothnie is a barrister practicing mainly in intellectual property, trade practices, telecommunications and general commercial law in Australia. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:55 pm
Michael Geist, Duncan Bucknell and Warwick Rothnie are reporting on a G20 agreement on a World Intellectual Property Court under the aegis of WIPO, the website of which is modestly silent on the remarkable development. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 10:45 pm by Kim
Warwick Rothnie (first posts: October 2004) and I (first post: way back in June 2002 believe it or not) are starting to look like elder statespeople in the Australian IP blogosphere. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:07 am
IceTV The New Law of Copyright in Australia View more presentations from Warwick Rothnie. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 12:11 am
Exposure Draft Here Media Release Here Warwick Rothnie Here Michael Geist Here And since I've just printed out a copy, my analysis forthcoming. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 3:14 am
Warwick teaches patents in the postgraduate program at the University of Melbourne and Designs at Monash University. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:52 am
 Fellow blogger and Australian IP scholar Warwick A Rothnie has also drawn the Kats' attention to a podcast on Intellectual Ventures at This American Life, noted on ipwars.com, here. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
Warwick Rothnie posted his initial thoughts at ipwars.com here before a posting a more detailed summary and analysis last night here. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:01 pm
A lawsuit such as this in Canada would be clearly beyond the pale.However, in all seriousness, this decision should be studied carefully in Canada for what it has to say about joint ownership and authorship, the implied assignment issue, the recording contract issue, and the laches, estoppel and acquiescence issue.BTW, as Warwick Rothnie points out, this is the last IP judgment we will see from their Lordships as such, who now have a new new building and and a new name, namely… [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
  "The sixth panel session at AIPPI’s Sydney Congress, moderated by my co-Guest Kat Warwick Rothnie, focused on issues for IP law raised by “Big Data”—a term arguably dating from as early as 1989.The question for debate was whether existing IP rights sufficiently protect the interests of those in industry who create and use Big Data, but discussion moved quickly into the related topics of AI and the Internet of Things.The session opened with a… [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
Via Australian barrister and IP scholar Warwick Rothnie comes a pointer to Crikey.com.au, which in turn links to what it says is the Commonwealth Government’s Online Copyright Infringement Discussion Paper July 2014. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 3:53 am
The AmeriKat's jet lag finally taking over,but not before she brings you news from themusic and copyright panelWhile the AmeriKat was recovering from moderating the epic which was the trade secrets session at the first morning of AIPPI's World Congress in Sydney, Warwick Rothnie was being entertained by something more lyrical in the copyright and music panel session. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:47 pm
Come near the AmeriKat with a medical device andthis is the look you will encounterWarwick Rothnie was back in AIPPI's Pharma Day sessions to report on the proceedings for the IPKat's readers. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:59 pm
  Warwick Rothnie reports:"Jurgen Meier (moderator) outlined the theme of the session as looking at increasing questions from European Patent Office examiners beyond the traditional requirements of novelty and inventive step: whether an application for a life science patent is plausible or credible. [read post]