Search for: "Washington v. Armstrong" Results 1 - 20 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 8:49 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Armstrong denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, or in the alternative for a permanent injunction and mandamus, in Mackey v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm by Susan Brenner
Rayment, 2011 WL 4036687 (Washington Court of Appeals 2011). [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Dan Ernst
Newman’s Hugo Black, Laura Kalman’s Abe Fortas, and Mark V. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] BATTLE OF THE SOMME WEEK – PART V: WHAT DID IT ALL MEAN? [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
Deputy Solicitor General Thomas Hungar argued for the United States, Thomas Armstrong of Von Briesen & Roper argued on behalf of Atlantic Research, and Washington State Deputy Solicitor General Jay Geck argued on behalf of Washington, forty additional states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico, who had filed as amici. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm by David Oscar Markus
In 1979, Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong published the groundbreaking book, The Brethren. [read post]