Search for: "Washington v. Harper" Results 141 - 160 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 3:49 am
The court cited Harper v McCall, 277 AD2d 589, as its authority for this view. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:59 pm
Plata but having also in the past extended enormous deference to prison officials, including in Washington v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Karen Tani
Cooper (GrayCrown), by journalist Geoffrey Gray (here); The Golden Empire: Spain, Charles V, and the Creation of America (Random House), by British historian Hugh Thomas (here); and the prison memoir Then They Came for Me: A Family’s Story of Love, Captivity, and Survival (Random House), by Iranian Canadian journalist/filmmaker Maziar Bahari with Aimee Molloy (here).For lighter fare, head to the New York Times, where you'll find a review of THE BIG SCRUM: How Teddy Roosevelt… [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
In the case of Robin (Hunt) Hankel v The Hartford Insurance Company /The Hartford Financial services Group, the plaintiff was a woman employed in the health Safety and Environmental Management/ Engineering field for Harpers. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:45 am by Nathan Koppel
At issue in the hearing was the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in Washington v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am by James Bickford
Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses FCC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Big Tent Democrat
Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990); see also, e.g., Rochin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am by Adam Chandler
” Meanwhile, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by Ray Dowd
Marsh, 9 F.Cas. 342 (1841), in which the defendant had copied 353 pages from the plaintiff's 12-volume biography of George Washington in order to produce a separate two-volume work of his own. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
No, said the court, noting that the Supreme Court has specifically rejected requiring an adversarial hearing with representation by counsel when making psychiatric medical determinations, even if they ultimately result in involuntary commitment , citing Washington v Harper, 494 US 210. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]