Search for: "Washington v. Peterson" Results 1 - 20 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
She learned she was pregnant just days before the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
Peterson (Criminal; Fraudulent Conduct; Costanoan-Chualar Indian Tribe) Archambault v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Peterson, Daggers & Fighting Knives of the Western World 60 (1968). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
First Jan. 6 Defendant Convicted at Trial Receives Longest Sentence of 7 Years MSN – Spencer Hsu and Tom Jackman (Washington Post) | Published: 8/1/2022 The first U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
After graduating from Yale in 2001, she spent a year working as an associate at Jenner & Block in Washington, D.C., before going to clerk for Judge David Tatel of the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Another was filed by attorney Dan Peterson, representing Law Enforcement Groups and State and Local Firearms Rights Groups (Law Enforcement Brief), while a third was filed by the Crime Prevention Research Center, led by John R. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Donahue has posted to SSRN her history-laden amicus curiae brief in FBI v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda:     THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto     Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020)    July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
As Todd David Peterson has written, the “contention that there are historical precedents for the use of Congress’s inherent contempt power against officials who assert the President’s claim of executive privilege is incorrect. [read post]