Search for: "Washington v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 12:00 am by John P. Ahlers
Ass’n of Tacoma, 50 Wash. 236, 96 P. 1078 (1908), City of Seattle v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Cook, 159 Wash.2d 837, 154 P.3d 206 (Washington Supreme Court 2007 (quoting Tenore v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (458 U.S. 457, 1982) and Hunter v Erickson (393 U.S. 385, 1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
A decision from a Seattle area trial court sustained a challenge similar to the Utah challenge to an expert witness proffered by plaintiffs’ firm Brayton Purcell. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
In reaction to this evidence, Natural Selection recalled all its spinach products with “use by” dates from August 17 to October 1, 2006.9 Although Dole spinach was just one of many brands initially recalled, subsequent data analysis revealed Dole as the sole source of the outbreak. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
In reaction to this evidence, Natural Selection recalled all its spinach products with “use by” dates from August 17 to October 1, 2006.9 Although Dole spinach was just one of many brands initially recalled, subsequent data analysis revealed Dole as the sole source of the outbreak. [read post]