Search for: "Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1" Results 21 - 40 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
Seattle School District No. 1 (2007), he wrote: “The principle that racial balancing is not permitted is one of substance, not semantics. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:05 am by Nassiri Law
In 2000, the court ruled 6-3 in Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:05 am by Nassiri Law
In 2000, the court ruled 6-3 in Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:28 pm by Gail Heriot
Seattle School District No. 1 (1982), a 5-4 decision that was a logical mess. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
In dismissing a suit challenging Trump’s outside business interests for lack of standing, a federal district judge noted: “As the only political branch with the power to consent to violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause, Congress is the appropriate body to determine whether, and to what extent, {Trump]’s conduct unlawfully infringes on that power. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Home Sharing Could Face New Regulation in Seattle August 31, 2017  | Katie Cramer Average home prices in Seattle, Washington have jumped more than 12 percent in the past year. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Tausend Professor at Seattle University School of Law. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
District Court – Western District of Washington – Judge James L. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Gerrymandering to Supreme CourtWashington Post – Robert Barnes | Published: 11/1/2015 Steve Shapiro worked on an assignment for a class at American University’s Washington College of Law, where he is a first-semester student. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Michael Froomkin
The controlled choice programs in Seattle, Washington and Louisville, Kentucky were struck down by the Supreme Court because both school districts explicitly conside [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Erickson and the 1982 ruling in Washington v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
They might include (1) the cost of making calls to a bank to get a card canceled and reissued, (2) the time spent completing paperwork to get funds reinstated, and (3) perhaps some overdraft fees and possibly some minimal liability of $50. [read post]