Search for: "Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1" Results 41 - 60 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
They might include (1) the cost of making calls to a bank to get a card canceled and reissued, (2) the time spent completing paperwork to get funds reinstated, and (3) perhaps some overdraft fees and possibly some minimal liability of $50. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:49 pm by Amy Howe
Seattle School District No. 1, in which the Court struck down a voter initiative that prohibited mandatory busing designed to promote racial integration in public schools. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Seattle School District No. 1, overturning a voter-approved statewide ban on the use of busing to achieve racially integrated public schools. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by Melissa Hart
Seattle School District No. 1, this kind of shift in decision-making authority violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm by Gail Heriot
Seattle School District was itself based on Hunter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm by David Oscar Markus
Last summer he interned for a federal district court judge in Seattle, and this summer he has been working in the federal public defender's office, also in Seattle. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  The city school district had adopted a student busing plan to combat de facto racial school segregation, but the voters of Washington then amended the state constitution to ban such plans. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
They lived in Seattle, Washington, until 1998 when they moved to Perth, in Western Australia. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 pm by Justin P. Walsh
Thus, we hold the identities of public school teachers who are subjects of unsubstantiated[1] allegations of sexual misconduct are exempt from disclosure under Washington’s public disclosure act (PDA), former chapter 42.17 RCW, amended and recodified as chapter 42.56 RCW (LAWS OF 2005, ch. 274). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
The defendants initially removed the lawsuit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, but on December 9, 1965, District Court Judge Robert Tehan remanded the case to the state circuit court where trial was conducted by Circuit Court Judge and former Marquette Law School professor, Elmer W. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
The District Court found that Petitioner and Respondent were married in Evanston, Illinois and lived in Seattle, Washington for approximately eight years before moving to Australia, and, while residing in the United States, the oldest of the Children was born. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
The District Court found that Petitioner and Respondent were married in Evanston, Illinois and lived in Seattle, Washington for approximately eight years before moving to Australia, and, while residing in the United States, the oldest of the Children was born. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
Seattle School District No. 1. [read post]