Search for: "Washington v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 17,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2024, 9:57 am by Mike Zamore
Imagine a 27-year-old woman in eastern Washington State who has a young son and becomes pregnant. [read post]
State of the Current Regulations Currently, SBA’s affiliation regulation (13 C.F.R. 121.103(a)(3)) provides that control—giving rise to affiliation for size purposes—can be negative. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
When the censorship system was recently put before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:26 am by Reference Staff
Harris & Ewing Collection, Library of CongressThe “Johnson” of the Johnson-Reed Act was Washington State Representative Albert Johnson. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm by centerforartlaw
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 10:43 am by Emma Babler
People of color are disproportionately prosecuted for gun crimes, which, in part, prompted the Black Public Defenders Amicus Brief in support of expanding gun rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
The Center for Applied Environmental Law and Policy (CAELP) recently prepared a white paper to help litigants defending agency actions better understand Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 am by Little West
 Other states, including California, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, and Washington, are considering additional AI restrictions. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:04 am by Noah Chauvin
Senator, a state senator, and a state court judge who reported alleged civil rights violations. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
And then the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:21 am by Unknown
H.R.9372 - To take certain Federal land in the State of Washington into trust for the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, and for other purposes. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]